Susannah Su vs Natalie Barbir Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Su vs N. Barbir

Susannah Su

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Natalie Barbir

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Su 1 - 0 Barbir

They have played 2 sets in total, with Susannah Su winning 2 and Natalie Barbir winning 0. The last match between Susannah Su and Natalie Barbir was at the W25 Perth, 17-09-2023, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Susannah Su getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Su	1
Barbir	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) W25 Perth(09-17-23)

Stats

Susannah Su

Natalie Barbir

S. Su vs N. Barbir H2H Profile

S. Su	Stats	N. Barbir
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (3-3)	Career Total W/L	21.62% (40-145)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Su vs N. Barbir Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Susannah Su has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Natalie Barbir has won 33.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Susannah Su, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natalie Barbir has won 62.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Susannah Su has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natalie Barbir has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Susannah Su has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Natalie Barbir winning 22.22% (W/L 2/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Susannah Su has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Natalie Barbir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 3/7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Susannah Su has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Natalie Barbir has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Susannah Su winning 1 times and Natalie Barbir being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Susannah Su winning 2 and Natalie Barbir winning 0.
The last match between Susannah Su and Natalie Barbir was at the W25 Perth, 17-09-2023, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Susannah Su getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Susannah Su has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Natalie Barbir has played against players with an average rank of 66.44.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Susannah Su has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natalie Barbir has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Susannah Su has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natalie Barbir has converted 21.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Susannah Su vs Natalie Barbir Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Su vs N. Barbir H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Su	Stats	N. Barbir
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Su Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Wellington - 11-12-2023
Q1 Angela CuiA. Cui	L	6-3 1-6 10-6	Stats
W25 Perth - 18-09-2023
Q1 Natalie BarbirN. Barbir	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
Q3 Jelena CvijanovicJ. Cvijanovic	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
W25 Perth - 11-09-2023
R1 Haruna ArakawaH. Arakawa	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Q3 Jamie LauJ. Lau	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Barbir Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W35 Brisbane - 20-10-2025
Q1 Angela CuiA. Cui	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
W35 Wagga Wagga - 15-09-2025
Q3 Angela CuiA. Cui	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Q2 Miranda PoileM. Poile	W	6-2 7-6(4)	Stats
W35 Wagga Wagga - 08-09-2025
Q3 Elizabeth IvanovE. Ivanov	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q2 Charlotte NichollsC. Nicholls	W	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Su vs N. Barbir Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Su	Stats	N. Barbir
50.00% (3/3)	YTD Win/Loss	21.62% (40/145)
53.85% (7/6)	Sets Win/Loss	24.81% (99/300)
49.09% (54/56)	Games Win/Loss	37.47% (1285/2144)
50.00% (3/3)	Hard Win/Loss	21.21% (14/52)
0% (0/0)	Clay Win/Loss	20.00% (21/84)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	30.00% (3/7)
0.06	Aces Per Game	0.02
3	Aces Total	40
0.46	Double Faults Per Game	0.1
25	Total Double Faults	167
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
85	Average Opponent Rank	320.82
47% (69/146)	1st Serve %	61% (1531/2494)
52% (36/69)	1st Serve Win %	49% (755/1531)
25% (19/77)	2nd Serve Win %	34% (329/963)
48% (10/21)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (92/224)
49% (73/148)	Return Points Win %	39% (910/2349)
60.00% (3/2)	Challenger W/L	22.09% (19/67)
0.00% (0/1)	Futures W/L	21.21% (21/78)
50% (3/6)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	20% (37/181)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (13/23)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	28% (9/32)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (43/34)
0% (3/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (43/9)
0% (3/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	4% (142/5)